Comparing Rocking Horse Winner the Movie and Novel Essay...

Comparing Rocking Horse Winner the Movie and Novel The short story, Rocking-Horse Winner, and the movie based on it contrast considerably. When the written story has ended the movie continues with ideas, which may not come from the author. Three major differences of the two are: the mother, the father, and the ending. In the movie the mother, Hester, is portrayed as a loving and self-sacrificing person. While in the short story she is exposed to be a cold-hearted, and greedy person. Another instance where the short story and movie differ is the role of the father. In the beginning of the written story the author reveals Hester to be a cold-hearted mother. She had bonny children, yet she felt they had been thrust upon†¦show more content†¦And arent you lucky either, mother? I cant be if I married an unlucky husband. But by yourself, arent you? I used to think I was, before I married. Now I think I am very unlucky indeed(77). In the written story Hester also appears to be greedy. When Paul arranges for her to receive one thousand pounds a year for five years, Hester wants it all at once. He said Pauls mother had had a long interview with the lawyer, asking if the whole five thousand could not be advanced at once, as she was in debt(83). In the movie Rocking-Horse Winner Hester is depicted as a loving and self-sacrificing mother. When the Uncle Oscar refuses to give the mother any more money, she takes her favorite garments to a local tailor. She then proceeds to sell them and a suitcase for an unfair price. In the movie Hester is very concerned when Pauls brain starts swelling. She tries to convince him to go away to the country, however he persuades her to let him stay until after the derby. When Paul goes into the coma-like state his mother sits at his bedside and cries when he dies. After Paul dies Hester wants nothing to do with the money, she even tells Bassett to burn it. The heartless Hester in the written story never shed a tear when Paul died. Another major difference between the written story and the movie is the character of the father. In the short story the author only mentions him briefly. The father went to town to some office. But thoughShow MoreRelatedDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 PagesConflict 375 SKILL LEARNING 376 Interpersonal Conflict Management 376 Mixed Feelings About Conflict 376 Diagnosing the Type of Interpersonal Conflict 378 Conflict Focus 378 Conflict Source 380 Selecting the Appropriate Conflict Management Approach 383 Comparing Conflict Management and Negotiation Strategies 386 Selection Factors 386 Resolving Interpersonal Confrontations Using the Collaborative Approach A General Framework for Collaborative Problem Solving 391 The Four Phases of Collaborative Problem SolvingRead MoreStrategic Marketing Management337596 Words   |  1351 Pagesmanager’s historical experience are likely to be perceived as being of little significance and subsequently screened out. Th ere is a need, therefore, to balance the benefits of the mentality filter with a willingness to assess and possibly incorporate novel and perhaps extreme signals. 3 The power filter, which is essentially an attitude of mind on the part of top management and reflects a willingness to incorporate material in the strategic decisionmaking process that falls outside the bounds of previous

How Does Othello Rate - 1896 Words

How Does Othello Rate? Is this the best, the second-best, the worst of William Shakespeare’s tragedies? Where does it place in the lineup? Let’s consider where it deserves to be and why in this essay. The play is so quotable; consider Desdemona’s opening lines before the Council of Venice: â€Å"My noble father, / I do perceive here a divided duty,† or Othello’s last words: â€Å"Killing myself, to die upon a kiss.† Could the continuing reputation of Othello be attributed to the quotable â€Å"ultimate form† in which the Bard of Avon expressed his ideas? Robert B. Heilman says in â€Å"The Role We Give Shakespeare†: If we use the word â€Å"support,† however, we do name a way in which Shakespeare serves. It is the way of venerable†¦show more content†¦The audience meets initially a wealthy playboy Roderigo, a cunning military ancient Iago, and an esteemed senator of Venice, Brabantio. Scene 2 introduces the audience to the Moor, his lieutenant Cassio, and two groups of people (Brabantio’s search party and Cassio’s party from the council). Scene 3 involves the audience with the duke and senators of the council, Desdemona, a sailor, a messenger, officers, and attendants. The host of characters make for a complex number of parts. On top of this group, the audience is exposed to unending sequences of action, ceaseless presentations of motivations and causes for the actions, and other aspects of the play. The number of â€Å"parts† is very great; consequently the variety is very great, and, as Heilman says, there results this special quality of just about anybody in the audience being able to identify with some of these â€Å"parts.† Another reason for the lofty ranking of Othello is found in what Northrop Frye in â€Å"Nature and Nothing† refers to as â€Å"human wisdom†: If we pay more attention to the difference between poetic and other kinds of thought, and deal with such a word only in its specific dramatic contexts, our other and better feeling that Shakespeare’s plays take us into the very center of human wisdom will be justified. (37). Such human wisdom can be found in Iago’s initial words to sleepy Brabantio: â€Å"Zounds, sir, y’are robbed! For shame, put on your gown! /Show MoreRelatedConflict is a Major Issue in Othello1173 Words   |  5 Pagesmajor issue in Othello, the source for all the problems in the story all lead back to love and jealousy. Love can be an extremely powerful thing in life. It can easily draw two people closer together or simply destroy something that could have been great. Ironically similar, jealousy can tear something apart just as fast as love can. This timeless tragedy starts out in Venice, with a plot to attain revenge on Othello. Iago and Roderigo are simply jealous with the fact that Othello has promoted CassioRead MoreOthello as Tragic Hero1578 Words   |  7 PagesIn what ways does Shakespeare present Othello as a typical tragic hero? Professedly, Shakespeare appears to present Othello as tragic hero, exposing his tragic flaw, which consequently leads to his downfall, through his use of language, structure and form. It could be argued ‘Othello’ appears to conform to Aristotle’s principles of tragedy, of the noble protagonist who undergoes perpetia and endures suffering, resulting in his ultimate downfall due to harmatia, which he eventually realises, providingRead MoreShakespeares Jealous Husbands908 Words   |  4 PagesResponse to Shakespeare’s Jealous Husbands: Othello and Leontes In Shakespeare’s Jealous Husbands: Othello and Leontes by Paul Dean is a play that dramatized the comparison on how Jealousy in Othello with Jealousy in Shakespeare’s late romance The Winter’s Tale, serves as a substance that increases the rate of a chemical reaction without itself undergoing any permanent chemical change for further action. Shakespeare’s ideas about jealousy came from a variety of literary and cultural traditions,Read MoreA Midsummer Nights Dream And Richard II Vs Othello Essay1379 Words   |  6 PagesDream and Richard II vs Othello. In Midsummer Night’s Dream, we encounter four main female characters who come from three different backgrounds. It is a play that shows a good picture of woman’s lack of freedom. It is a story of several couples about of which there is a fairy king, Oberon, who proves his dominion over the queen of the fairies. There was a conflict between Oberon and Titania about who should keep the Indian c hild, whose mother had died recently. Titania does not want to give the childRead MoreEssay on Racism and Interracial Marriage in Othello3666 Words   |  15 PagesRacism and Interracial Marriage in Othello Othello: The Moor of Venice is probably Shakespeares most controversial play. Throughout this work, there is a clear theme of racism, a racism that has become commonplace in Venetian society which rejects the marriage of Othello and Desdemona as anathema. The text expresses racism throughout the play within the language transaction of the dialogue to question the societal ethos established by Othello, thereby making him nothing less than a culturalRead MorePerformance Review2177 Words   |  9 Pagesfilmmakers are merely using the authority of a playwrights or novelists name, when really what they have produced in no more than a second-rate adaptation adhering to Hollywood’s code rather than a literary one. Tim Blake Nelson, director of the 2001 film ‘O’ said: â€Å"Before filming began, the cast rehearsed and then performed ‘Othello’ to the entire crew of the film so that they understood the characters and story of the play in detail.†[3] Although the film itself couldRead MorePhilip Larkin Love and Marraige4262 Words   |  18 PagesLove and Marriage with Philip Larkin and Eavan Boland Ashley Couch Houghton College It is strange how time changes relationships. When I first started dating the man who is now my fiancà ©e, one of my biggest fears was of walking down the aisle on our wedding day, feeling unsure that I was making the right decision by marrying him. Now what I most often fear for our relationship is falling out of love, as so many couples do. This is something I brood on, discuss, and develop intricate strategies againstRead MoreExpo5600 Words   |  23 PagesShakespeare s plays, like life, never allow us the delusion of perfect understanding. Nevertheless, we do need to decide what we are invited to think and feel about Macbeth and what he does. In particular, we have to consider why he acts as he does; why, in the first place, he kills Duncan, and then why, acting as he does, he can still attract our interest, sympathy, even admiration. The answer to the first of these questions appears to be the easier, but is in fact the more difficult. I shall argueRead MoreDuchess Of Malf Ope n Learn10864 Words   |  44 Pagessixteenth-century theatre scene. This unit will look at Webster’s most well-known play, The Duchess of Malfi, and consider some possible reasons for the play’s continued prominence in the twenty-first-century theatre repertoire. The Duchess of Malfi does indeed have ‘plenty of blood’, but this is nothing unusual in Renaissance tragedies. Webster’s play is a tragedy about a forbidden love, more specifically a forbidden marriage, which leads ultimately to the deaths of the lovers and many others. Webster’sRead MoreMarkStrat6407 Words   |  26 Pagesof this industry. Situational Analysis: The Environmental Analysis General Factors The Othello world is an industrialized country of 80 mil inhabitants. This world does not intend to represent any particular country, market or industrial sector. There is no major political, social or economic event upcoming. The overall economy has been growing at a rate of 4% and it has an average of 2% inflation rate but it is unlikely that inflation reach higher levels in the future. Therefore both inflation

The Manliest Instrument free essay sample

Ever since I can remember, I have been harassed, urged, and prompted to play the violin. However, it was only recently that I started to be the one doing the urging. One fateful birthday, I ripped open my birthday package with suspicions about its oddly shaped wrapping. As my mother watched with shining eyes, my first violin rolled into my lap, instead of the Mighty Morphin’ Power Rangers set I had long been anticipating. My immediate, heartbroken thought was, â€Å"What kind of boy plays the violin?† For many years afterward, I made it my mission to explicitly and implicitly remind my mother of my disdain for the birthday present. At every orchestra rehearsal, every violin lesson, every church recital, I was the juvenile bane of conductors, instructors, and proctors everywhere. I was jealous of my friends who had sensible parents who allowed them to engage in more masculine activities, such as martial arts or baseball. We will write a custom essay sample on The Manliest Instrument or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page If I absolutely had to play an instrument, I wanted to take up something brassy and obnoxious, something I could blast on until my face turned red. I even envied the cellists across the orchestra hall whose instruments seemed huge and stalwart next to my tiny and wimpy violin. However, with my mother and violin tutor teaming up to make my life miserable, prospects of burning my violin and making it look like an accident seemed slim. As my dislike grew, so too did their determination to reform me. Thus was my mentality when I entered junior high school. The future of the next six years of my education as a teenager seemed bleak, as my violin instructor had, through my mother, reached her arm into my schedule and branded it with period 2 Orchestra. As I shuffled in on the first day, however, I noticed something different about the room. For the first time, I had friends who were in the same orchestra as I was. As I settled into a chair in the back row with one of my best friends, the conductor explained that our positions would not be determined by one recital alone, but that we were allowed to challenge the player above us for the spot, once a week. Never had I heard of something so flexible, so competitive, so†¦ fun. My recital was abysmal, as was to be expected. Out of all my higher-ranking friends, I was the only one in second violin. Rattled, I determined to challenge my way up until I beat them, or at least until I sat close enough to chat with them in class. But with each player I beat, other, unintended emotions took hold. With my drive to win came the passion to master the notes. As we moved away from idyllic, romantic pieces to wicked, contemporary ones, I found myself actually liking the music, and when we came back around in a circle to Mozart and Tchaikovsky, they weren’t so bad either. I realized that the unthinkable had happened: I liked playing the violin. Playing in that orchestra with my friends was the foothold for reaching greater heights. When I entered high school, I entered the College of the Canyons’ Philharmonics, where I performed with the LA Philharmonics at the Disney Hall. Though I still preferred to play in orchestras, I advanced through the Certificate of Merits test and attended competitions. Through the various stages of my walk, I became acquainted with Beethoven and Viotti. I lamented that I would never hear the end of Schubert’s Unfinished Symphony, and understood why Schumann could only be calmed by his own music. The echoes of these sensational composers handed me a staff upon which I could harmonize passion with inspiration, and perseverance with purpose. Playing the violin, by myself, with companions, and with people unfamiliar, has made up a large part of my identity. Through the years, I have tuned my violin with experience and practice, and it in turn has tempered me by teaching me more drive and discipline than martial arts could ever hope to. The instrument looks intensely different from how I saw it years ago: the once meek and feminine-looking scroll has transformed into the prow that heads my resolve, and the bars that once bored me to sleep now stoke the furnace in my chest. The violin has made me the man I am today, making it, of course, the manliest instrument ever.

How Successful Were Stalins Economic Policies in the 1930s free essay sample

It is debatable as to whether these policies can be viewed as successful, for example; the conditions of the Soviet industrial workers were marginally lower than in 1928. Yet whatever hardships the workers faced, the fact that Russia was ultimately capable, in an economic sense, of defeating Nazi Germany in a successful military struggle shows that some of the economic implications enforced during the 1930s were at the very least marginally productive and gainful. In this essay, I shall highlight the extent to which the aforementioned policies can be viewed as successful. Stalin’s economic policies had one essential aim—the modernisation of the Soviet economy via two essential methods: collectivisation and industrialisation. Beginning in 1928, much of Russia’s economy (in terms of agriculture and industry) was brought directly under state control. Under Stalin, this was to be total. The way these radical were changes implicated has meant that the process was referred to as the ‘second revolution,’ a way of equating the importance of industrial/modernisation as that of the 1917 revolution. When Stalin introduced these drastic changes, he claimed that they marked a significant and vital stage in Soviet Communism as had Lenin’s actions during the October Revolution of 1917. It is understandable to claim that these comparisons show that the process of modernisation in Russia was intended primarily to enhance his own position as leader of Russia, following the footsteps of Lenin, with actual hopes for true economic progress taking second priority. However, it would be biased and unarguable to regard Stalin’s policies as purely a matter of political expediency. His former policy of ‘Socialism in One Country,’ that is, reforming Russia into that of a modern state capable of defending itself against the surrounding capitalist nations prove that he believed the needs of the USSR could only be met via the modernisation industry. This appeal that modernisation was the only way the nation could survive was later used as a pretext for the severity and coercive methods that accompanied the collectivisation of Russian agriculture. The collectivisation of agriculture was viewed by Stalin as being the only viable way to raise the necessary capital needed to industrialise the Soviet Union. However, it has been speculated that the way in which this policy was enforced was ultimately counter-productive. Collectivisation was the process of taking all the suitable farming land from the peasantry and bringing it under state control. Peasants would no longer farm for individual profit; they would instead combine their efforts together and receive a wage. Stalin believed that this change would allow the USSR to pool the collective profits together from the land in order to finance a colossal industrialisation programme. In keeping with Marxist philosophy, the needs of Industry and the industrial working-class were viewed as more important than that of the agricultural peasantry—a class of people seen as obsolete. In a major propaganda offensive, a class of ‘Kulaks’ were identified who were responsible for supposedly holding back the workers’ revolutions by controlling the best land available and employing other peasants to work for them—reminiscent of Feudalism, an ideology seen as the forerunner to capitalism in the eyes of Karl Marx and subsequently denounced by Marxist philosophy as a result. Stalin believed that unless this alleged class was dispersed, the modernisation of Russia would be impossible. In actuality, however, the mere concept of a Kulak class has been described as a Stalinist myth. These people were, in actuality, only the best farmers who had naturally begun to rise above their peers as a result of their superior traits. They were not the exploiting landowners made out to be by state propaganda. The subsequent â€Å"de-Kulakistation’ that followed suit could be seen as counter-productive overall. Stalin had merely purged the new collective farms of their finest and most competent workers severely hindering his agricultural productivity. Indeed, not only did this process hinder the effectiveness of agricultural production by the elimination of the state’s most capable farmers, the period between 1929 and 1930 in which mass disturbances occurred throughout the whole USSR shows that the attitudes of the peasantry towards collectivisation was extraordinarily negative. As the peasants made up 80% of Russia’s populace, their support could seen as near-essential were modernisation to be effective. In the aforementioned years, there were over 30,000 arson attacks and organised rural disturbances increased by one-third from 172 to 229. Bewildered and confused, the peasants would often refuse to co-operate in the deliberate destruction of their traditional way of life. As a result, the majority of the peasants would eat their own crops and slaughter their livestock in protest. Despite the lack of crops and livestock, Soviet authorities instead responded with even fiercer coercion, which made the matter entirely worse. Their tactics of imprisonment, deportation and execution did nothing to quell the real problem of the decline food consumption per head. Between 1928 and 1932 the consumption in bread fell from 350kg per head to only 214. 6. The same can be observed in the fall of livestock. Between the same years, the fall in cattle fell from 70million to 34million. Stalin’s solution to this was to spend special contingents of party workers to the rural towns in order to restore the food production levels by working on the agricultural land themselves. This however, was ultimately counter-productive. Their lack of farming knowledge only added to the disrupted. Even as mass famine set in, the little grain that was being harvested was being exported as ‘surplus’ to obtain the foreign capital needed to fuel industrialisation. However, in terms of industrialisation, it could be argued that Russia made significant progress throughout the 1930s. As well as attempting to eliminate the failings of Russia’s backwards past, he also asserted that he was preparing Russia for war against its capitalist rivals abroad. In Stalin’s view, Iron, Steel and Oil were all fundamental for the strength of a nation from a military perspective. He believed that were Russia to achieve the same industrial revolutions the West had experienced, which had been based on iron and steel production, then Russia would ultimately too become equally powerful. Throughout the 1930s, Soviet industrialisation took the form of a series of Five-Year Plans (FYPs). The first of which operated between 1928 and 1932; the second, 1933 to ’37, and finally; the third plan ran from ’38 to ’41, when it forced to a halt by Operation Barbarossa. A significant weakness and flaw in these supposed ‘plans’ was that they were not really plans to any extent at all. They were merely a set of targets that Stalin demanded be achieved by a specific date. This created a number of problems. The methods of coercion that had been employed during the collectivisation process had struck terror into the local officials and managers. Subsequently, they purposely falsified their production figures to give the impression they had indeed met their desired targets when, in fact, they had fallen significantly short. These positive (but largely exaggerated) figures only helped to fuel Stalin’s economic naivety, and prompted him to create an ‘optimal’ plan which reassessed the targets upwards. These revised demands were hopelessly unrealistic seeing how the original targets were not being met in the first place. However, no matter how overly exaggerated the figures submitted may have been, the success of the 1st FYP plan was indeed a significant success. The overall output in resources, such as coal and iron all increased in huge proportions. Between 1927 and 1932, the production in coal rose from 35 million tonnes to 64million. The increase in oil was also significant, rising from 12 million to 21 million tonnes. In conclusion, I believe Stalin’s economic policies were ultimately a pyrrhic victory, in that the achievements made were significant and desirable, notably in terms of industry, but were gained at the severe cost of other aspects of Russia’s economy, for example; agriculture was ignored and ultimately suffered at a colossal scale. Despite Stalin’s ambition to bring Russia up to scale with Western society, old-fashioned, wasteful methods of construction were being utilised. Rather than using efficient machinery (of which had been adopted in the West), massed labour continued to be used. As peasants were removed from the rural, agricultural locations and brought to work in the industrial plants and factories, their inexperience and lack of discipline and knowledge proved to be instrumental in hindering Russia’s progress from an economic perspective. Nonetheless, they can be considered a success owing to the fact that Russia was in a strong enough position by 1941 to beat Germany after the latter’s invasion.